Aabø, S. (2005). Are public libraries worth their price? A contingent valuation study of Norwegian public libraries. New Library World, 106(11/12), 487-495.
Aabø, S. (2009). Libraries and return on investment: A meta-analysis. New Library World, 110(7), 311-324.
Alampay, E., Alampay, L., and Raza, K. (2012). The impact of cybercafés on the connectedness of children left behind by overseas Filipino workers. Global Impact Study Research Report Series. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information School.
Amariles, F., Paz, O. P., Russell, N., and Johnson, N. (2006). The impacts of community telecenters in rural Colombia. Journal of Community Informatics, 2(3).
Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P., Leamer, E., Radner, R., and Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register, 58(10): 4016–4614.
Best, M. L., Garg, S., Kollanyi, B., and Fellows, M. (2012). Understanding and rethinking shared access: How people collaborate and share knowledge and technologies in Ghanaian cybercafés. Global Impact Study Research Report Series. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information School.
Bowman, N. A. (2010). Can 1st-year college students accurately report their learning and development? Academic Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 466-496.
Brazilian internet Steering Committee (CGI). (2009). Survey on the use of information and communication technologies in Brazil 2009. Retrieved from: http://www.cgi.br.
Cecchini, S., and Raina, M. (2004). Electronic government and the rural poor: The case of Gyandoot. Information Technologies and International Development, 2(2), 65-75.
Chambers, R., and Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS Discussion Paper 296. Brighton, Sussex, UK: Institute of Development Studies.
Chung, Hye-Kyung. (2008). The contingent valuation method in public libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 40(2), 71-80.
Crockett, L. J., Schulenberg, J. E., and Petersen, A. C. (1987). Congruence between objective and self-report data in a sample of young adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2(4), 383-392.
Dana, J. C. (1920). The New Museum: A plan for a new museum. Woodstock, VT: Elm Tree Press.
Dutta, S., and Bilbao-Osorio, B. (Eds). (2012). World Economic Forum’s Networked Readiness Index. The Global Information Technology Report 2012. Retrieved from:
Earl, S., Carden, F., and Smutylo, T. (2001). Outcome Mapping: Building Learning and Reflection into Development Programs. Ottawa: IDRC.
Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
Etta, F. E., and Parvyn‐Wamahiu, S. (Eds.). (2003). Information and communication technologies for development in Africa. Volume 2: The experience with community telecenters. Ottawa: CODESRIA/IDRC.
Ghana Statistical Service (2010). 2010 Population & Housing Census. Retrieved from:
Haseloff, A. M. (2005). Cybercafés and their potential as community development tools in India. Journal of Community Informatics, 1(3), 53‐65.
Heeks, R., and Molla, A. (2009). Compendium on Impact Assessment of ICT-for-Development Projects. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester Centre for Development Informatics.
Holt, G. E., and Elliott, D. (1998). Proving your library’s worth: A test case. Library Journal, 123(18), 42.
Holt, G., and Elliott, D. (2003). Measuring outcomes: Applying cost-benefit analysis to middle-sized and smaller public libraries. Library trends, 51(3), 424-440.
Huyer, S., Hafkin, N., Ertl, H., and Dryburgh, H. (2005). Women in the information society. In G. Sciadas (Ed.), From the Digital Divide to Digital Opportunities: Measuring Infostates for Development (pp. 135-196). Montreal: Orbicom/NRC Press.
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). (2010). World Reports 2010. Retrieved from:
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). (2007). World Reports 2007. Retrieved from:
International Telecommunications Union. (2011). Key Global Telecom Indicators for the World Telecommunication Service Sector. Retrieved from:
Junco, R. (2013). Comparing actual and self-reported measures of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 626-613.
Kolko, B., Racadio, R., Deibel, K., Krause, K., and Prempeh, J. (2012). The value of non-instrumental computer use: Skills acquisition, self-confidence, and community-based technology teaching. Global Impact Study Research Report Series. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information School.
Krutilla, John V. (1967). Conservation reconsidered. The American Economic Review, 57(4), 777-786.
Kuriyan, R., and Toyama, K. (2007). Review of research on rural PC kiosks. Technology for Emerging Markets, Microsoft Research India. Retrieved from:
Mahmood, K. (2005). Multipurpose community telecenters for rural development in Pakistan. The Electronic Library, 23(2): 204-220.
Mercer, C. (2006). Telecentres and transformations: Modernizing Tanzania through the internet. African Affairs, 105(419), 243‐264.
National Statistical Coordination Board (n.d). Urban/rural classification. In Philippine Standard Geographic Code. Retrieved from:
Naumer, C. M. (2009). The situated logic model: A method for measuring impact. In M. Crandall and K. E. Fisher (Eds.), Digital Inclusion: Measuring the impact of information and community technology (pp. 109-118). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
OECD (2007). Measuring the impacts of ICT using official statistics. Retrieved from:
Parkinson, S., and Lauzon, A. (2008). The impact of the internet on local social equity: A study of a telecenter in Aguablanca, Columbia. Information Technologies and International Development, 4(3), 21-38.
Ramírez, R., Parthasarathy, B., and Gordon, A. (2012). Infomediaries: Brokers of public access, final report. Global Impact Study Research Report Series. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information School.
Rangaswamy, N. (2009). The non-formal business of cyber cafes: A case-study from India. Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society, 7(2/3), 136-145.
Rea, P. (1916). Proceedings of the American Association of Museums. Volume 10. Charleston, South Carolina: American Association of Museums.
Rissola, G., and Centeno, C. (Eds.) (2011). ePractice digital literacy workshop on digital competences for social inclusion actors and intermediaries. Luxembourg: European Commission. Retrieved from: http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC65355_TN.pdf
Rogers, P. (2008). Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions, Evaluation, 14(1), 29-48.
Sciadas, G., with Lyons, H., Rothschild, C., & Sey, A. (2012). Public access to ICTs: Sculpting the profile of users. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information School.
Seale, J. (2009). Digital inclusion. Southampton, U.K.: The Teaching and Learning Research Programme, University of Southampton. Retrieved from:
Sen, A. (2000). Development as Freedom. NY: Random House Digital, Inc.
Sey, Araba, and M. Fellows. (2009). Literature review on the impact of public access to information and communication technologies. TASCHA Working Paper, No. 6. Seattle, WA: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington. Retrieved from:
Smith, N. (1994). State agency use of planning and role setting for public libraries and output measures for public libraries. Public Libraries, 33(4), 211-12.
Statistics Lithuania (2011). 2011 Lithuania Population Census Brief. Retrieved from:
Sumner, A. (2012). Where Will the World’s Poor Live. CGD Working Paper 305. Washington, D.C.: Center for Global Development. Retrieved from:
Survey Working Group (2012). Global Impact Study surveys: Methodologies and implementation. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information School. Retrieved from:
Totolo, A., and Renken, J. C. (2012). The impact of public access venue (PAV) information and communication technologies (ICTs) available at libraries on sustainable livelihood strategies and outcomes in Botswana. Global Impact Study Research Report Series. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information School.
Van House, N., Lynch, M. J., McClure, C., Zweizig, D., & Rodger, E. J. (1987). Output measures for public libraries: a manual of standardized procedures (2nd ed.). Chicago: American Library Association.
Walton, M., and Donner, J. (2012). Public access, private phone: The interplay of shared access and the mobile internet for teenagers in Cape Town. Global Impact Study Research Report Series. Seattle: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information School.
Weech, T. (1988). Validity and comparability of public library data: A commentary on the Output measures for public libraries. Public Library Quarterly, 8(3-4), 7-18.
Zerbe, Richard O. Jr. (2007). The legal foundation of cost-benefit analysis. Charleston Law Review 2: 93.